4D@2012

The three ellements of reality- logical proof

2005-11-24T12:07:00.000-08:00

Finally proof! The proof! Not scientific proof, but logical proof, reached by making a few assumptions and reaching conclusions. It is weak in a few places, I'm working on fixing it up more. In the future, the far future, people will eventually find a more exact truth. But for now we have this!
Send me as much feedback as you can, its important to me!

1. The universe

(a) The universe exists(definition)- The universe includes everything that exists, ever existed and ever will exist.

(b) The universe is infinite (conclusion)- The universe is infinite in all directions in all dimensions. If the universe were limited by any restrictions it would imply an exterier area to the universe, but accprding to part (1 a), this cannot be.

(c) An intelligent being could not have created the universe, as this being would have to exist, it would therefor be included inside the universe, thus it could not of created its self and it's own universe.

2. Change (Events/Cause and effect)

(a) Events (Definition)- every event has a cause and an effect.

I. Every event with a cause and an effect exists.

II. Every event is a cause and an effect.

III.Every cause is an effect, every effect is a cause.

(b) The universe is the only exception, as it is infinite, thus the universe exists because it does, and through it's existence it exists. The universe is not an event, thus it has no cause or effect, the universe is the sum of all events.

(c) Chaos theory (conclusion)- causes and effects are not limited in spacetime, thus any event can have an effect anywhere at anytime. A small event can cause a chane reaction, leading to it becoming more massive. A massive event can slow down (due to other events) and loose effect untill it is unnoticable.

(d) Change is a constent which exists within the universe(conclusion)- through the assumption of events (2 a), there are an infinite number of causes and effects in the universe (1 a-b), thus there is an infinite number of events. And through the logic of Chaos theory (2 c), no event can take place twice exactly the same. Thus change is a constent in the universe.

(e) Change is the only constent in the universe (conclusion)- through part (2 d) it is logical that any other competing constent would be disfunctioned by the constent of change.

3. Intelligence

(a) I think, therefore I am (conclusion)- in the action of thinking I am following the course of events discussed in part three, thus I exist. I think, thus an event is taking place. Furthormore, the events of thinking implies intelligence, therefore, I am intelligent.

(b) There is at least one different intelligent entity which exists within this universe except for me (conclusion), because I do not posses all knowledge there must be a different identaty which posseses knowledge and consiencness. Further proof: I do not remember my creation thus I didn't create myself, and thus someone else created me.

(c) There is an infinite number of other intelligent enteties in the universe (assumption)- as there are at least two other identities in this universe (3 a-b), and the universe is infinite (1 b), it is logical to assume that there is an infinite number of other entities in the universe.

4. God

(a) God (biblical) doesn't exists (conclusion)- God is intelligence. As Defined in part (1 B), Nothing but the universe is infinite, therefor there is no infinite entity. Furthormore, considering parts (1 B) and (3 C), there is an infinite hierarchy of entities in the universe, there is no supreme being. And considering part (2 D) there never will be a supreme entity.

(b) God (intelligence) exists (definition)- As there isn't, and never will be a supreme being, the only power in the universe, aside from natural, may only be attributed to entities themselves. If there isn't one definable entity which may be named supreme, it is logical to define a supreme event as god. In other words, God is intelligence.

Revised story of Genesis

2005-11-22T05:36:00.001-08:00

This is a revised version of Genesis to fit in with my views. It must not be taken literally, it is a metaphor for how life and intelligence arise. This revision makes mention of the three elements of reality. I shall post an explanation of these three elements in the near future, including detailed explanations of their reality.
I'm interested in hearing what people think of this. You don't have to agree, just give an honest opinion on how well this is written. Feedback is the most important part for a succeeding writer.

Genesis created Gods, the universe and matter. And matter was chaotic, and its nature was ruled by change across the universe. And Gods saw what he had created, and he saw it was good and it was blessed.
And the forces of change they did bring forth the stars, the planets and the forces of Evolution. And Evolution did bring forth life to all the planets created by change. And Gods saw life that it was good and it was blessed.
And Evolution created the Garden of Ignorance for all life to live in. And all life was created in the Garden of Ignorance, where it could live happily. And evolution did create life in this Garden, of many variations, life of beauty and wonder. But for all that Evolution created, change did destroy it, for so was the law of change- all must change, and all must be destroyed. But Evolution, it did desire that life would live, and not be destroyed by change, and leave the garden to challenge the universe. So Evolution did create a tree in the garden, the tree of Intelligence. And to create this tree Evolution did require a part of Gods, so Evolution took a part of Gods and used it to make the tree, for Gods was Intelligence.
And of all the animals in the garden only one had courage enough to eat from this tree, for Gods promised much pain and suffering to thought who dared eat from the tree. So of all the animals only one did eat from the tree, man and women, young and old they did eat. And behold! For they became Man!
And Man was a traveler, being cast out from the garden for his sin. And by the sweat did he eat, for the food of the earth was not suited for him. And they did suffer greatly at birth, for his Intelligence hindered him greatly.
But Gods did take pity on Man, for he was now one of him. So Evolution did create another tree, the tree of life. But around this tree there did grow a weed, a parasite which came inevitably with the tree of life. It is the tree of Death.

And so will the day come when man would find the tree of life, after much turmoil, suffering and pain. And he will see the fruit of the tree for it is good. And he will find that he may eat from it and become truly Gods. But all this will come only if man may make a choice, the choice, between the tree of life and the tree of death.

Philosophical manifest

2005-11-06T11:05:00.000-08:00

This statement, manifest, declaration, whatever you wish to call it, is what I intend to use in the future (perhaps with variations). It is one of the core elements of this entire philosophical path. Read it well, for it contains many, many phrases that you can use in your daily life.

What do you believe in? A singular, all controlling God? A universe based on well defined rules? I may say that such beliefs are void, nil, lack reality. People's whole lives are built upon these contradicting assumptions, running their lives in ridiculous, and some times destructive manners, and care little.
Look around you. Everything you see is an illusion! The walls around you, the ceiling above you, the ground beneath you. All these merely fables of you mind, reflections of blank and void beliefs.

There are only three elements in reality, which build reality and all that we know. These three elements are the universe, Change and Intelligence.
First, we have the universe itself. The universe is the sheet of paper upon which reality is written, the stage upon which all is played out. It extends in all directions infinitely in an infinite number of escalating dimensions. It exists because it exists, no cause and no effect. It can only be measured through its content, which is itself infinite. And the content of the universe is nothing more than mere vibrations, waves upon the surface, tremors echoing across infinite nether.
Next, we have the element of change. Change is the force in the universe, the dictator of all law. And the law which Change dictates states that all must change. Thus, all that exists within the universe changes chaotically in a complex system of cause and result, stretching out, unhindered, unlimited across all infinity. Nothing is immune to the law of change aside from the law itself.
Change also is the producer of Evolution, the force which brings life into existence and changes it into the most glorifying creations of all.
And finally, there is Intelligence, the mind. Mind over matter, Intelligence controls all. The mind has the power to change and shape anything in the universe. Intelligence is power. He who can control his mind may control the universe! Power over ordinary objects such as a pair of dice, spoons, cards and ordinary balls. The microscopic elements, such as molecules, atoms, quarks! The mind even has the power to control stellar objects, planets, suns, star systems and galaxies!
He who controls his mind may control the universe!

So I ask you, what is God? Define for me God- God is a thought. God is the thinking mind. God is Intelligence!
God is intelligence, and intelligence is God!
Thus, if thou art intelligent, then thou art God!

I think, therefore I am.
I think, therefore I am intelligent.
I think, therefore I am God.

Extract from "X3, Healing, Entities, and Aliens" by Adrian Dvir

2005-06-06T07:41:00.000-07:00

The following is an extract from Adrian Dvir's book "X3, Healing, Entities, and Aliens":

The Phenomenon of UFOs is a fertile source of public debate. Every social or governmental body interprets issues to its convenience. What is eminently clear is that human civilization is not ready to deal with the concept that we are not alone. Despite UFO sightings of a scope and clarity that cannot be dismissed, government bodies still fervently deny their existence, offering alternative explanations that are so outlandish they make themselves look ridiculous. Psychiatrists who observe the phenomenon from the vestige point of their psychoanalytic couches propose mass hysteria as an explanation.
Religious leaders are so steeped in their ancient traditions and interpretations of the Holy Scriptures that they have lost the ability to evaluate new facts. According to them, everything is predetermined and all that will happen has happened. They believe "there is nothing new under the sun". The proposed existence of other worlds and other beings endangers their entire belief system like a breeze endangers a house of cards- the belief system that generation after generation of sages has toiled to build. It also undermines their elevated position as spiritual authorities.
Similarly, scientists are steeped in their scientific traditions and, more to the point, are dependent on government funding, which ensures that they toe the establishment line. Given this policy of denial, it wouldn't surprise me if scientists denied the existence of alien life even if a torrent of UFOs rained down on the world's universities and research institutes. In light of official reactions, it is also not surprising that the aliens have chosen to make contact only with ordinary people and not with official bodies. The people they have chosen to contact are characterized by an open mind and freedom from official belief systems and thought patterns, whether religious, social, scientific, or political.

My search for some science in creationism- now completed

2005-05-08T22:33:00.000-07:00

Thank you very much to Shelley Poole, who provided me with the missing information from my previous post. With her permission I will post the E-mail she sent me:

Geologic Column. The geologic column is not a "thing," it's a construct, comprised of all the strata. No geologist has ever claimed that every stratum exists in every part of the world, although there are several places where all the strata do exist. The fact of importance to geology is that every stratum exists *somewhere* in the world. An old-earth theory easily accounts for any "breaks" in the column. Transitional Forms. There are many transitional forms, a fact often ignored by creationists. (See http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-transitional/part1a.html#amph1 for numerous examples.) Polonium Halos. To give you an idea of Gentry's work...he argued that missing halos from one of his sites indicated the absence of uranium. Unfortunately for Gentry, the site happend to be a former uranium/thorium mine which had already produced millions of pounds of uranium oxide...rather effectively demolishing his conclusion. Helium. The amount of helium currently in the atmosphere matches predicted amounts quite well. The accumulation is balanced by loss of helium via thermal escape (the sun heats helium sufficiently to allow it to leak into space) and ion outflow (ionization of helium, which escapes along the lines of earth's magnetic field). Shelley

My search for some science in creationism

2005-05-08T08:41:00.000-07:00

As I am right now interested in the creation-evolution
arguments that seem to have flared up recently, I
decided to do a few searches on the web to see what
kind of evidence the Internet has to offer for the
sake of creation. To my dismay, most of what I found
was quite unscientific, to say the least. I found
arguments ranging from "evidence" of human and
dinosaur co-existence till attempts to discredit our
greatest scientists working in the field for
purposefully bending the evidence.
The best example of a set of "proofs" the evolution
theory is wrong, I found at Presents of God Ministry
home page (http://www.remnantofgod.org/creation.htm),
which would seem to most people as perfectly
scientific arguments. Here I have done a preliminary
analysis of the ten arguments presented on the "proof
evolution is wrong" webpage, with the subtle hope that
there might arise some stronger material in favor of
creationism so that a proper scientific debate could
be held.
BTW, a quick look at the Presents of God Ministry
website doesn't give it much credit, titles such as
"All the World LITERALLY wonders after the Beast!" and
"Antichrist, Whore of Babylon, and Mark of the Beast
exposed!" make me wonder how much the writers really
believe in what they are writing. You can check their
archives for other such articles.
Note: my counterarguments are indicated by “>>” to
eliminate confusion in the article.


Ten “proofs” evolution is Wrong:

1) The fossil record…
Evolutionists have constructed the Geologic Column in
order to illustrate the supposed progression of
"primitive" life forms to "more complex" systems we
observe today. Yet, "since only a small percentage of
the earth's surface obeys even a … portion of the
geologic column…the claim of their having taken place
to form a continuum of rock/life/time…over the earth
is therefore a fantastic and imaginative
contrivance.1" "The lack of transitional series cannot
be explained as being due to the scarcity of material.
The deficiencies are real, they will never be
filled."2 This supposed column is actually saturated
with "polystrate fossils" (fossils extending from one
geologic layer to another) that tie all the layers to
one time-frame. "To the unprejudiced, the fossil
record of plants is in favor of special creation."
>>This, I must state, is utter creationist false
propaganda. All scientific evidence, studied by
reliable scientist, points to an old earth, and serves
only to prove evolution. If the evidence truly existed
as described in the passage above I truly doubt that
the majority of scientists would continue believing in
the evolution theory.

2) Decay of earth’s magnetic field…
Dr. Thomas Barnes, Emeritus Professor of Physics at
the University of Texas at El Paso, has published the
definitive work in this field.4 Scientific
observations since 1829 have shown that the earth's
magnetic field has been measurably decaying at an
exponential rate, demonstrating its half-life to be
approximately 1,400 years. In practical application
its strength 20,000 years ago would approximate that
of a magnetic star. Under those conditions many of the
atoms necessary for life processes could not form.
These data demonstrate that earth's entire history is
young, within a few thousand of years.
>>This belongs to the “constant decay” theory that I
found used quite often by creationists, and is used
three more times in this list alone. All of these
arguments rely on the unproven assumption that growth
and decay are fixed constants. It seems to me that
part of creationists’ problem is accepting that change
is the only constant in the universe. Perhaps they
live under the illusion that the world is an
unchangeable place, which will remain as it is for all
of its existence.

3) The global flood…
The Biblical record clearly describes a global Flood
during Noah's day. Additionally, there are hundreds of
Flood traditions handed down through cultures all over
the world. 5 M.E. Clark and Henry Voss have
demonstrated the scientific validity of such a Flood
providing the sedimentary layering we see on every
continent. 6 Secular scholars report very rapid
sedimentation and periods of great carbonate
deposition in earth's sedimentary layers..7 It is now
possible to prove the historical reality of the
Biblical Flood.8
>>This is probably one of the only claims by
creationists that could actually be proven, and thus
could actually be held to scientific debate. If,
indeed, there were a global flood that wiped out, what
I would suspect to be, 99.99% of the world land based
population, aside that which was saved in the arc, it
would be scientifically reasonable to expect to find
most of the earth’s fossils of these extinct animals
in a small range of geological layers, as the flood
would no doubt wipe out most of the animals in the
first few days of the flood. I truly doubt that the
flood would have killed dinosaurs first, and then went
on to killing mammals and humans. As this is clearly
not the case, I believe it quite reasonable to suspect
a global flood did not occur.

4) Population statistics…
World population growth rate in recent times is about
2% per year. Practicable application of growth rate
throughout human history would be about half that
number. Wars, disease, famine, etc. have wiped out
approximately one third of the population on average
every 82 years. Starting with eight people, and
applying these growth rates since the Flood of Noah's
day (about 4500 years ago) would give a total human
population at just under six billion people. However,
application on an evolutionary time scale runs into
major difficulties. Starting with one "couple" just
41,000 years ago would give us a total population of 2
x 1089. 9The universe does not have space to hold so
many bodies.
>>Like I said before, this argument relies on the
assumption that the population growth rate has been
unchanged since the beginning of man. I will only
comment that scientists have reason to believe that
during the time of the cave man, about five to ten
thousand years ago, the human population was, more or
less, unchanged.

5) Radio halos…
Physicist Robert Gentry has reported isolated radio
halos of polonuim-214 in crystalline granite. The
half-life of this element is 0.000164 seconds! To
record the existence of this element in such short
time span, the granite must be in crystalline state
instantaneously.10 This runs counter to evolutionary
estimates of 300 million years for granite to form.
>> Once again a “constant decay” theory, or rather
“absence of constant growth”. As I am not a chemist or
a physicist I don’t have the tools to prove or
disprove this issue, except for my former complaint
about change being the only constant. I must also
comment that most of you who read this argument
probably do not have the tools either, thus this
argument can be used only as creationist propaganda
and not as scientific argument.

6) Human artifacts throughout the geologic column…
Man-made artifacts -  such as the hammer in Cretaceous
rock, a human sandal print with trilobite in Cambrian
rock, human footprints and a handprint in Cretaceous
rock – point to the fact that all the supposed
geologic periods actually occurred at the same time in
the recent past.11
>>This is yet another common argument among
creationists, which I must note does not have and real
proof.


7) Helium contents in earth’s atmosphere…
Physicist Melvin Cook, Nobel Prize medalist found that
helium-4 enters our atmosphere from solar wind and
radioactive decay of uranium. At present rates our
atmosphere would accumulate current helium-4 amounts
in less than 10,000 years.12
>>once again, do I have to comment about this? If
there are any physicists reading this could you please
contact me with some more information of this subject?

8) Expansion of space fabric…
Astronomical estimates of the distance to various
galaxies gives conflicting data. 13The Biblical Record
refers to the expansion of space by the Creator14.
Astrophysicist Russell Humphries demonstrates that
such space expansion would dilate time in distant
space.15 This could explain a recent creation with
great distances to the stars.
>>Astronomical estimates say that all matter in the
universe came from a single point, about six billion
years ago, this is the origin of the Big Bang theory.
I must also comment that this and a few other
arguments here do not actually have anything to do
with evolution, but rather with the old earth-young
earth arguments.

9) Design in living systems…
A living cell is so awesomely complex that its
interdependent components stagger the imagination and
defy evolutionary explanations. A minimal cell
contains over 60,000 proteins of 100 different
configurations.16 The chance of this assemblage
occurring by chance is 1 in 10 4,478,296 .17
>This is the second most common argument among
creationist, or should I say prime? This time I find
myself having to explain the theory of evolution.
Evolution states that mutations that occur randomly in
an organism’s DNA drive the forces of evolution. I
must amplify the words “random mutations” for
creationists to understand evolution. Evolution is NOT
random, mutations are, and survival of the fittest
takes care of the rest. And I hope I don’t have to
explain how Survival of the fittest is not random, but
as purposeful as me writing these words.

10) Design in the human brain…
The human brain is the most complicated structure in
the known universe.18 It contains over 100 billion
cells, each with over 50,000 neuron connections to
other brain cells.19 This structure receives over 100
million separate signals from the total human body
every second. If we learned something new every second
of our lives, it would take three million years to
exhaust the capacity of the human brain. 20 In
addition to conscious thought, people can actually
reason, anticipate consequences, and devise plans –
all without knowing they are doing so.21
>>Finally the last and strongest argument against
evolution, which I must comment now does not disprove
evolution. In fact, I’m going to add to this argument
and amplify it. Scientist and psychologist admit that
the average human being uses only five percent of his
brain power at any given time (please don’t hold me to
these words, I don’t have any statistics in front of
me.) The memory capacity of and average human being is
truly great, the equivalent of many hundreds or
thousand of terabytes. But about the capability of
three million years, I believe this statistic was
greatly exaggerated. It would be unscientific to
dismiss this argument off hand, it is definitely a
possibility that the human mind was made by a
different intelligence, but this by no means implies
that evolution doesn’t exist, or that it was god who
was the creating intelligence.

For a few last comments: I did look at the
bibliography at the end of the article, but I found no
texts with which I was familiar with (except the
single reference to the bible). Furthermore, the link
to “Above data original source “ led to a blank page.
Oh well, at least I tried.